Balanced Exchange Framework · Framework Version 1.0 · 2026-08-22
This page is also available as Markdown; the whole framework is at /llms-full.txt.

ANNEX D - REGULATORY REFERENCES

Ta Annex je regulatorna orientacija, ne nadomestilo za entity-specific legal opinion. Če se relevantno pravo spremeni ali začne uporabljati nov režim, P15 Regulatory Change Trigger zahteva ponovno presojo.

United States - primary regulatory references (source freeze 18 August 2026)

• FinCEN FIN-2014-R002 (30 Jan 2014), Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to Virtual Currency Software Development and Certain Investment Activity - own-account virtual-currency investment / software-assisted purchase analysis.

• FinCEN FIN-2013-G001 (18 Mar 2013), Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to Persons Administering, Exchanging, or Using Virtual Currencies - user / administrator / exchanger and money-transmitter framework.

• SEC Interpretive Release Nos. 33-11412 / 34-105020, File S7-2026-09 (17 Mar 2026; effective 23 Mar 2026), Application of the Federal Securities Laws to Certain Types of Crypto Assets and Certain Transactions Involving Crypto Assets; includes CFTC guidance.

• SEC, Exempt Offerings and Private Funds materials (current 2026) - Reg D, Reg CF, Reg A and private-fund routes where a BEF transaction/overlay is a security.

• Public Law 119-27, GENIUS Act (18 Jul 2025) and implementing materials - payment stablecoin perimeter; P23 does not classify LANA as a payment stablecoin absent stable-value/redemption facts.

• IRS, Instructions for Form 1099-DA (2026), Digital Asset Proceeds From Broker Transactions - broker/customer sales, basis/proceeds, W-9/W-8/TIN and backup-withholding implementation.

• OFAC FAQ 560 and Sanctions Compliance Guidance for the Virtual Currency Industry - digital currency is subject to the same sanctions obligations; tailored risk-based screening controls.

• State primary sources listed in Annex M: state banking/financial regulators, money-transmission statutes, virtual-currency/digital-asset statutes and current guidance. Ambiguous states are not treated as exempt merely because no explicit prohibition was located.